Loading policy action…
Why this action matters
Backed by researchDivestment from animal agriculture is critical due to its significant contribution to greenhouse gas emissions, with animal-based diets linked to over 50% higher environmental impacts compared to plant-based diets, including higher land use, water use, and biodiversity loss [Scarborough et al., 2023]. Animal agriculture accounts for over 54% of anthropogenic methane emissions, a potent driver of climate change, and reducing its scale can rapidly slow global warming while enabling food systems to transition into carbon sinks [Rockström et al., 2023].
Concept connections
Drafted by softwareBnature Speople Ethe economy · ▶what this action affects ◀what it needs first · Tap a concept to see other actions linked to it
What this action would change
Backed by researchThe action itself
Divesting public pension and council investments from livestock-heavy food production sectors and redirecting capital toward plant-based and sustainable food alternatives reduces financial support for high-methane food systems and promotes low-impact dietary shifts.
What it would change in the UK
In the UK, this action reduces exposure to high-methane food production, which is the largest source of agricultural methane emissions, and aligns with the legal commitment to reduce GHG emissions by 78% by 2030. It also supports dietary shifts toward plant-based diets, which have been shown to reduce environmental impacts by up to 50% for most indicators, including GHG emissions and land use.
What it would change worldwide
UK divestment sends a market signal that increases the financial cost of industrial animal agriculture globally, potentially accelerating the transition to plant-based food systems. This aligns with global efforts to reduce anthropogenic methane emissions, which the food system contributes to by over 54%, and supports the broader goal of halting biodiversity loss and limiting global temperature rise.
Where national politics stands
Nothing recorded yetWhat councils have decided (57)
Supporting — 7
Opposing — 1
Mentioned / neutral — 49
The research behind it
Published research about food and farming as a whole, not this action in particular
We are holding this summary back until we have checked it
This summary was written before we started checking summaries against the papers they cite, so it has not been checked.
Research that argues the other way
We are holding this summary back until we have checked it
This summary was written before we started checking summaries against the papers they cite, so it has not been checked.